Header Ads



The Future of the Engineering Faculty of South Eastern University of Sri Lanka, Oluvil

-By  Dr.Aboobacker Rameez-

I am writing in reference to a recent article appearing in Colombo Telegraph on the 27th November, 2015, entitled “Minister Kiriella: Engineering At Oluvil To Be Closed And Students Shifted”. I felt that this article was inimical not only to all those students pursing their studies at the university, but also to all those who have been working there as part of the university community. It seriously dents the image of the university. 
I believe that some of the concerns of the Engineering students of SEUSL/Oluvil are valid. Nevertheless, their demands and reactions are unreasonable and disproportionate.

New faculties and new university do encounter challenges at the outset
It is common that new faculties or universities, when they are first established, encounter numerous challenges in terms of lack of physical and human resources. I know of a medical faculty in a university in the Eastern Province, when it was founded in 2005, was faced with a lot of challenges. It had only one consultant and a PhD holder. The rest of the teaching staff, all, had only undergraduate degrees. This predictably caused a lot of hue and cry from the students and parents. Nevertheless, this medical faculty continued to operate under these difficult circumstances for a few more years before the situation began to improve and completely changed for better.  At present, this medical faculty is equipped with over ten consultants with either post-graduate or doctoral degrees. Its students are now fully satisfied. The same was also the case when the Engineering Faculty was first established in another University in 1997. 

The Engineering Faculty of South Eastern University has now got fifteen academic staff. Of them, five are senior lecturers.  Three of them hold doctoral degrees, and another three graduate degrees. Those with undergraduate degrees are reading for their masters in various reputed universities. The quality and quantity of the teaching staff are expected to improve fast. The new incentive offered by the UGC recently, in a circular, to senior academic staff working at the Engineering Faculties of other universities but are willing to move to the SEU is a great move in the right direction.  There is also the likelihood of a coordinator being appointed to oversee visits by the visiting lecturers from other universities. There are a lot of positive steps being taken. Therefore, it is important that students take note of all these positive developments before they engage in any activism.  

Updated Curriculum
I learn that the curriculum of the faculty was designed by a team of prominent consultants, numbering over twenty from Moratuwa, Peradeniya, Open and Ruhuna Universities; and that it is on par with curricula in world-class Engineering universities. A delegation, which included the State Minister of Higher Education and a Senior Professor of engineering, recently visited the university to look into the issue at hand. It was fully satisfied with the curriculum of the faculty. Criticism about the quality of the curriculum seem to have no sound basis. 

Lab equipment and machineries
Another concern of the students is the lack of equipment and machineries. But the faculty is equipped with modern equipment and machineries, purchased at colossal cost. Under new governmental allocation, procurement process is still underway to purchase more modern equipment. 

Visiting lecturers are experts in their specific field 
The visiting lecturers are experts in their fields, and are already employed at Moratuwa, Colombo and Ruhunu Universities. It is true that having visiting lecturers result in conducting of classes during the weekend, and that cancellations too occur due to unforeseen circumstances preventing them from arriving in the university on scheduled times and days. This issue, without no question, should be addressed forthwith. Nevertheless, there is no question about the professional integrity and suitability of these visiting lecturers. 

Ample Opportunity for Linkages with Industries
There have been some criticism against the choice of Oluvil as a location for an engineering faculty. But Oluvil is in the coastal areas of Ampara district, which was very badly affected by both the civil war and the tsunami in 2004. Ampara district is currently home to a lot major construction and reconstruction works, which provide ample opportunity for civil engineering students to have onboard training. Ampara is also the home to Hingurana Suger Factory (Galoya Plantation), Bio Mass (Bio Energy Power Plant), Inginiyagala Power Plant, and a number of rice mills, all of them offer many and varied opportunities for engineering students to undertake their training in.   

Closing down the engineering faculty, or even shifting it, is impracticable; and has no precedence in Sri Lanka. Should it happen it would establish a bad precedence making it difficult for new faculties being established elsewhere in the future. In addition, finding placements for the three hundred students would be a monumental task. Even if some of them were to find placements in other universities, the differences in the curricula would make it harder for them to pursue their studies. 

It is true that there are valid concerns, but calling for the shifting or even closing of the faculty is not the best solution.  Better solutions can be found by the students engaging the authorities in dialogue and negotiations. I personally know that the University authorities are receptive to the valid concerns of the students. The intense nature of their reaction to the problems would do more harm than good. Boycotting lectures would delay the completion of their degrees; and when they pass out later than the planned year, they might be entering a saturated job market. 

It is to be noted that the Minister of Higher Education and Highways, Hon. Laksman Kiriella, has yesterday dismissed the news about the closing down of the Faculty of Engineering, SEUSL and requested that students and parents be not misled by such fabricated stories. He also promised that the faculty, like other faculties, would be upgraded with all necessary requirements in the future. (www.madawalanews.com) 

Moreover, the Higher Education Ministry, the University Grand Commission and the university authorities need to seriously look into the concerns of the students and address them immediately. The circular issued by the UGC recently, promising incentives to those senior academic staff wanting to join the faculty of engineering at SEUSL, and the appointment of a coordinator are both welcome gestures. I am optimistic that the university authorities would do everything they can to address the concerns of the students to their fullest satisfaction.  

Dr. A.Rameez is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, SEUSL. 

7 comments:

  1. sir, don't publish these unwanted things in all the links. son't copy and paste it easily, there are 300 peoples life. don't spoil there life. if your child is in this situation you must not talk like this.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For the understanding of real context please follow this:- https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index.php/future-of-the-engineering-faculty-at-oluvil/

    ReplyDelete
  3. This faculty was started purely for political and personal reasons of former VC and his administration. staff were also recruited based on the personal favours. there were lot qualified members were willing to joint this faculty. but they were rejected based on the ethnic basis and personal favoritism . This is not only for E- faculty it also apply for other faculties as well. Students demand for high quality studies specially for engineering field is acceptable. they need to compete globaly once they pass out. they are not going to work at AGA office or government school as graduate appointees(most of the SEUSL graduates have only these option now).

    ReplyDelete
  4. பொறியியல் பீட விரிவுரையாளர்களை தவிர மற்றவர்கள் தான் கருத்து வெளியிடுகிறார்கள்...

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why can't an engineering faculty staff or an engineer give responsible answer for issues raised by students?

      By referring rice mills, sugar factory, 1 MW small power plant, and reconstruction works as a amble industry opportunities for a Engineering undergraduates, this article itself explains the severe shortage of industry exposure and severe facility shortages, experienced by engineering undergraduates in SEUSL.

      Lack of experienced/qualified academic resource is a huge concern for a quality of education. While other e-faculty students gaining their advanced engineering knowledge from highly experienced and knowledge rich doctoral academics, in SEUSL E-faculty, even third year subjects are taught by just passed-out BSc engineer.

      While in a batch, other 1000+ students are gaining good quality education and good exposure in other faculties, only 100 students are suffering in underprivileged place is not acceptable with any reason.

      This is not simple thing to play around. This is about 300 highly qualified students' future and 1000 more students' future who will be admitted in coming years.

      This is not just about infrastructure or lab facilities. It's all about quality of offered education and industry exposure. Expecting these in a resource lack place like Oluvil is unrealistic.

      Students are fighting for their rights of quality education. It is up to the stakeholders to permanently solve this issue at least now.

      Better Late Than Never.

      Delete
  6. நான் தென்கிழக்குப் பல்கலைக்கழகத்தின் விஞ்ஞான பீடத்தில் ஆரம்பகால்த்தில் கற்று வெளியேறியவன் ஆரம்ப கால மாணவர்கள் சில தியாகங்களைச் செய்ய வேண்டும் என்பது உண்மை அத்துடன் பொறியியல் மாணவர்களுக்கு தொழிற்துறைப் பயிற்ச்சிகள் வழங்கப்படுவது முக்கியம் என்பதும் உண்மை இவை இரண்டிற்றும் நடுவில் தீர்மானம் எட்டப்படல் வேண்டும் அத்துடன் இபவ்விடயம் தொடர்பாக பொறியியல் விரிவூரையாளர்களின் கருத்துக்கள் பெறப்படவேண்டுமே அன்று வேறு சகோதரர்கள் தலைலிடுவது தேவையற்ற விடயம்
    மற்றும் ஜமால் அக்ரமின் கருத்துக்களுடன் நான் உடன்படவில்லை இன்று நாட்டில் எங்கும் அரசியல் இனவாதம் இல்லாமல் இல்லை என்பதை புரிந்து கொண்டால் சிறந்தது இவை ஆக்ரோசமாக அல்லாமல் நிதானமாக அணுகவேண்டிய பிரச்சினை

    ReplyDelete

Powered by Blogger.